creditslips.org valuation and analysis
Robots.txt Information
| Robot | Path | Permission |
| GoogleBot | / | ✔ |
| BingBot | / | ✔ |
| BaiduSpider | / | ✔ |
| YandexBot | / | ✔ |
Meta Tags
| Title | Credit |
| Description | A discussion on credit and |
| Keywords | bankruptcy, consumer credit, law schools |
Server Information
| WebSite | |
| Host IP | 184.168.131.241 |
| Location | United States |
Related Websites
| Site | Rank |
More to Explore
creditslips.org Valuation
|
US$8,065,141
Last updated: 2023-04-27 22:00:06
creditslips.org has Semrush global rank of 1,312,352. creditslips.org has an estimated worth of US$ 8,065,141, based on its estimated Ads revenue. creditslips.org receives approximately 930,594 unique visitors each day. Its web server is located in United States, with IP address 184.168.131.241. According to SiteAdvisor, creditslips.org is safe to visit. |
Traffic & Worth Estimates
| Purchase/Sale Value | US$8,065,141 |
| Daily Ads Revenue | US$7,445 |
| Monthly Ads Revenue | US$223,343 |
| Yearly Ads Revenue | US$2,680,109 |
| Daily Unique Visitors | 62,040 |
| Note: All traffic and earnings values are estimates. | |
DNS Records
| Host | Type | TTL | Data |
| creditslips.org. | A | 598 | IP: 184.168.131.241 |
| creditslips.org. | NS | 3600 | NS Record: ns28.domaincontrol.com. |
| creditslips.org. | NS | 3600 | NS Record: ns27.domaincontrol.com. |
| creditslips.org. | MX | 3600 | MX Record: 10 mailstore1.secureserver.net. |
| creditslips.org. | MX | 3600 | MX Record: 0 smtp.secureserver.net. |
HtmlToTextCheckTime:2023-04-27 22:00:06
| Calculation of Secured Claims posted by Adam Levitin When I was a law student the rule I learned about secured claims was that they accrue post-petition interest and attorneys’ fees (if provided for by contract or statute) up to the amount of the value of the collateral that exceeds their claims, but then nothing further once they are fully secured. That was an easy enough rule to apply. But then the Supreme Court’s ruled in Travelers v. PG&E (2007) that the standard basis for disallowing the excess attorneys’ fees—the Fobian rule—was no longer valid. SCOTUS expressly left open the possibility of other arguments for limiting attorneys’ fees, but none have been successful in the courts of appeals so far. So this brings up a question: If post-petition interest is capped by the collateral cushion, but post-petition attorneys’ fees are not so capped and can therefore spillover into an unsecured claim, what is the order in which the collateral cushion is applied? That is, what is the |
HTTP Headers
HTTP/1.1 302 Found Server: nginx/1.20.1 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 02:38:16 GMT Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Connection: close Location: http://www.creditslips.org HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 02:38:16 GMT Connection: keep-alive Cache-Control: max-age=3600 Expires: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 03:38:16 GMT Location: https://www.creditslips.org/ Server: cloudflare CF-RAY: 6a171bdb3f012d40-ORD HTTP/2 200 date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 02:38:18 GMT content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8 x-content-type-options: nosniff x-phapp: oak-tp-web076 x-webserver: oak-tp-web076 vary: cookie,Accept-Encoding strict-transport-security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains x-varnish: 3741836423 age: 0 via: 1.1 varnish cf-cache-status: DYNAMIC expect-ct: max-age=604800, report-uri="https://report-uri.cloudflare.com/cdn-cgi/beacon/expect-ct" server: cloudflare cf-ray: 6a171bdb98402a0c-ORD |
creditslips.org Whois Information
WHOIS LIMIT EXCEEDED - SEE WWW.PIR.ORG/WHOIS FOR DETAILS |